TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - No, it wasn't a *proper* scientific comparison
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject No, it wasn't a *proper* scientific comparison
     
Posted by SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) on May 19, 2004 at 9:00 PM
  This message has been viewed 155 times.
     
In Reply To Can you provide more details posted by SR Productions on May 19, 2004 at 08:47 PM
     
Message I've said that in the past about other dynos I've seen and I'd be a hypocrit to not mention that about this one. It wasn't the same day, back to back or anything like that. The conditions were similar, the car was fully warmed up and cooled between runs and the boost I think was the same (correct me if I'm wrong). It just wasn't back to back, which is the ideal way to do it. So the result aren't exactly "proof" of anything really except he's happy with how the car runs now and it runs a hell of a lot cooler (which in SoCal with 91 octane is a big plus).

There have been other, better comparisions that show the same thing though. I think it was Xybertron that did it.


My 300Zs: www.zheaven.com - Have a question about either of my 300ZXs? Answers lie within.
Admin: www.350ZForum.com - Your source for the lastest info on the new Nissan 350Z!
Writer: www.SportZMagazine.com - Nothing but Z cars from cover to cover! Subscribe today!
Moderator: www.TwinTurbo.net - Hands down, the best site for 90-96 Z car info and discussion!

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.